DISPUTE SETTLEMENT BETWEEN THE ACTIVITY EXECUTION TEAM AND THE GOODS PROVIDER REGARDING THE USE OF VILLAGE FUNDS
Abstract
According to Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages, villages have a strategic and vital role in development which is carried out using the development budget in the form of Village Fund Allocation (ADD). Villages can self-manage the use of village funds by procuring goods and services. Procurement of goods or services using village funds often experiences problems because the providers do not hand over the product to the activity execution team. This situation happens even though the provider has received a down payment for purchasing goods the village needs. As a result, development in the village is constrained. This condition gave rise to disputes between the activity execution team and the appointed goods or service provider, which may be reported to the authority. Disputes between the activity execution team and the provider in procuring goods and services using village funds are settled through administrative and civil law because the act is a default. The settlement is carried out through discussions to achieve consensus. If it fails, the settlement is carried out through discussions led by the village head. If it fails again, the procurement contract resolution service will conduct the settlement. The final way of settlement is by filing a lawsuit in court, not through criminal law.
Abstrak: Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa, menempatkan desa mempunyai peran strategis dan penting dalam pembangunan, melalui anggaran pembangunan secara dalam bentuk Alokasi Dana Desa (ADD). Desa dalam melaksanakan swakelola penggunaan Dana Desa dapat melakukan pengadaan barang dan jasa. Pelaksanaan pengadaan barang/jasa yang dilakukan dengan menggunakan dana desa yang melibatkan penyedia barang/jasa sering mengalami permasalahan yang disebabkan penyedia barang/jasa tidak menyerahkan barang yang dibutuhkan oleh desa kepada Tim Pelaksana Kegiatan (TPK). Sementara penyedia barang/jasa sudah menerima dana dalam bentuk panjar, untuk kebutuhan pembelian barang yang dibutuhkan oleh desa, sehingga pelaksanaan pembangunan di desa menjadi terkendala. Kondisi ini menimbulkan perselisihan antara Tim Pelaksana Kegiatan (TPK) di Desa dengan pihak penyedia barang/jasa yang sudah ditunjuk, bahkan sampai membuat laporan ke penegak hukum. Penyelesaian perselisihan antara Tim Pelaksana Kegiatan (TPK) dengan Penyedia dalam pengadaan barang dan jasa yang menggunakan dana desa dilakukan melalui hukum administrasi dan hukum perdata karena perbuatan tersebut adalah wanprestasi. Sehingga penyelesaian sengketa yang terjadi antara penyedia dan TPK dilakukan melalui musyawarah untuk mencapai mufakat. Apabila tidak berhasil, maka penyelesaian perselisihan dilakukan melalui musyawarah yang dipimpin oleh Kepala Desa. Apabila tidak berhasil juga maka penyelesaian perselisihan tersebut dapat dilakukan melalui Layanan Penyelesaian Sengketa Kontrak Pengadaan dan jalan terakhir penyelesaian tersebut dengan cara mengajukan gugatan ke pengadilan. Jadi bukan melalui jalur hukum pidana.
Kata Kunci: Penyelesaian Sengketa, Hukum Penyedia Barang, Dana Desa, Penegakan Hukum, Gugatan Di Pengadilan
Those authors publishing in PETITA have agreed with following terms of conditions:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
